MGB & GT Forum
Fuel sender passes all tests but stops working when reinstalled
Posted by willymotts
Fuel sender passes all tests but stops working when reinstalled
#1
This topic is about my 1974 MG MGB V6 Conversion
|
|
willymotts
Bill Mottl (New Member)
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2024 05:28 PM
Joined 22 days ago
32 Posts
|
I just bought this '74 MGB which used to belong to a member of this forum. It has a 2.8 V6 Camaro engine and 5 speed transmission. I'm in the process of getting everything up to par. The most recent "issue" is the fuel sender. It pegs at full when grounded and the ohms are all correct. It works fine until I reinstall it into the tank. At that point, it reads empty (with about a half a tank of fuel...) The two wire sender originally had a resistor soldered between them but the dash gauge did not work then, either... Ideas?
Apr 11, 2024 05:45 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 3 years ago
1,019 Posts
|
willymotts
Bill Mottl (New Member)
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2024 05:58 PM
Joined 22 days ago
32 Posts
|
Nevada, Tx., USA
Sign in to contact
|
Apr 11, 2024 06:03 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 23 years ago
3,035 Posts
|
willymotts
Bill Mottl (New Member)
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2024 06:05 PM
Joined 22 days ago
32 Posts
|
Nevada, Tx., USA
Sign in to contact
|
Apr 11, 2024 06:09 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 23 years ago
3,035 Posts
|
willymotts
Bill Mottl (New Member)
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2024 06:13 PM
Joined 22 days ago
32 Posts
|
Arizona Shorty
Greg McC
|
Apr 11, 2024 07:24 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 8 months ago
776 Posts
|
Did it work before you inserted it into the tank? That is, with the sender wire attached, sender grounded, sender not in the tank, did the sender give you full range readings on the fuel gauge?
GMc
Wait for me at the gate Tuffy, because without you they're never gonna let me in.
SDCH WTCH-X Twin Oaks Tuff Nutt
2008 - 2022
GMc
Wait for me at the gate Tuffy, because without you they're never gonna let me in.
SDCH WTCH-X Twin Oaks Tuff Nutt
2008 - 2022
willymotts
Bill Mottl (New Member)
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 11, 2024 07:31 PM
Joined 22 days ago
32 Posts
|
Arizona Shorty
Greg McC
|
Apr 11, 2024 08:33 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 8 months ago
776 Posts
|
There you go. With sender installed, all you need is sender wire and tank ground. Should work the same.
If it doesn't, verify sender base is grounded. If the sender is isolated from the tank, the tank ground doesn't help. Sender needs ground.
GMc
Wait for me at the gate Tuffy, because without you they're never gonna let me in.
SDCH WTCH-X Twin Oaks Tuff Nutt
2008 - 2022
If it doesn't, verify sender base is grounded. If the sender is isolated from the tank, the tank ground doesn't help. Sender needs ground.
GMc
Wait for me at the gate Tuffy, because without you they're never gonna let me in.
SDCH WTCH-X Twin Oaks Tuff Nutt
2008 - 2022
Apr 11, 2024 11:01 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 21 years ago
5,529 Posts
|
Drewski
William Estaver
|
Apr 12, 2024 04:31 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 3 years ago
651 Posts
|
Had similar 'no gauge response to fuel level' problem using an "improved" sender purchased from one of our usual MG suppliers, which is also available from a couple of others.
(Should have bought an OEM style sender, but the "improved" description hooked me)
It is a white plastic unit, that grounds via a wired spade terminal.
The "improved' aspect was nothing more than a solid float, but the Resistance range was far out of line with the OEM 22 to 220. (not mentioned in the part description)
The particular problem with mine, which mirrors your lack of response to fuel level changes, was that the wiper contact arm was exerting too much pressure on the variable Resistance plate.
When checking manually before installation, arm freedom of movement appeared fine, but when in the tank the float buoyancy would not move the wiper arm.
Removed from tank, suspended over a bucket, and added fuel to see float response... float would not follow rise in level.
Had to very gently coax the contact arm to achieve less contact pressure until the bucket test became satisfactory.
Dealing with the erroneously high Resistance range, which would only drive the gauge to half the true tank level, lead me to abandon the 10V stabilizer, and use its 12V feed as my gauge circuit source.
This was done because my problem was too much circuit Resistance, and could not REMOVE Resistance, so had to increase Voltage.
I did this after calculating how much more current the total circuit Resistance would pass at 12V, and found it to be only a couple of 1/100ths of an amp.
The stock gauge, with its 'heater' type winding, now very closely reflects the true gallon to gallon fuel load.
The increase in amperage is so small, I have no concern that it would 'over drive' the heater winding.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-04-12 04:35 AM by Drewski.
(Should have bought an OEM style sender, but the "improved" description hooked me)
It is a white plastic unit, that grounds via a wired spade terminal.
The "improved' aspect was nothing more than a solid float, but the Resistance range was far out of line with the OEM 22 to 220. (not mentioned in the part description)
The particular problem with mine, which mirrors your lack of response to fuel level changes, was that the wiper contact arm was exerting too much pressure on the variable Resistance plate.
When checking manually before installation, arm freedom of movement appeared fine, but when in the tank the float buoyancy would not move the wiper arm.
Removed from tank, suspended over a bucket, and added fuel to see float response... float would not follow rise in level.
Had to very gently coax the contact arm to achieve less contact pressure until the bucket test became satisfactory.
Dealing with the erroneously high Resistance range, which would only drive the gauge to half the true tank level, lead me to abandon the 10V stabilizer, and use its 12V feed as my gauge circuit source.
This was done because my problem was too much circuit Resistance, and could not REMOVE Resistance, so had to increase Voltage.
I did this after calculating how much more current the total circuit Resistance would pass at 12V, and found it to be only a couple of 1/100ths of an amp.
The stock gauge, with its 'heater' type winding, now very closely reflects the true gallon to gallon fuel load.
The increase in amperage is so small, I have no concern that it would 'over drive' the heater winding.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-04-12 04:35 AM by Drewski.
Apr 12, 2024 05:06 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 17 years ago
4,362 Posts
|
Things that come to mind:
1) Do you have the one where the round mounting plate is metal or plastic? One wire or two coming off the sender?
2) Is the float filling up with fuel, thus dropping it to the bottom once installed?
3) Check the tank for continuity between it and the car body........i.e. confirm the tank is grounded.
4) A photo might help.
BH
1) Do you have the one where the round mounting plate is metal or plastic? One wire or two coming off the sender?
2) Is the float filling up with fuel, thus dropping it to the bottom once installed?
3) Check the tank for continuity between it and the car body........i.e. confirm the tank is grounded.
4) A photo might help.
BH
willymotts
Bill Mottl (New Member)
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 12, 2024 05:19 AM
Joined 22 days ago
32 Posts
|
willymotts
Bill Mottl (New Member)
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 12, 2024 09:09 AM
Joined 22 days ago
32 Posts
|
The float is fine with no leaks.
I ran a jumper wire from the spade terminals at the tank and sat in the front seat with the sender. It has complete and smooth action from Empty to Full. It also does not seem to be anywhere near the feed tube.
Any ideas before I put it back in the tank again?! Thanks.
I ran a jumper wire from the spade terminals at the tank and sat in the front seat with the sender. It has complete and smooth action from Empty to Full. It also does not seem to be anywhere near the feed tube.
Any ideas before I put it back in the tank again?! Thanks.
Forums
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or contact the webmaster