T-Series & Prewar Forum
Adjusting wiper blades
Posted by Bruce Cunha
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 24, 2024 01:34 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 9 years ago
4,087 Posts
|
The right wiper off the motor is not setting flat to the windshield. This is a motor I picked up at a car show.
I rechecked inside the arm. The two curved wedges are in place, and the arm is all the way in.
Can I remove material off the end of the shaft to move it in closer to the windshield without causing other issues?
Bruce E. Cunha
I rechecked inside the arm. The two curved wedges are in place, and the arm is all the way in.
Can I remove material off the end of the shaft to move it in closer to the windshield without causing other issues?
Bruce E. Cunha
Attachments:
LewPalmer
Lew Palmer
|
Apr 24, 2024 07:43 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 8 years ago
483 Posts
|
"Can I remove material off the end of the shaft to move it in closer to the windshield without causing other issues?"
Yes, Bruce, you can.
Motors come new with the longest shaft needed to fit all vehicles, so shortening the shaft is your best option.
Yes, Bruce, you can.
Motors come new with the longest shaft needed to fit all vehicles, so shortening the shaft is your best option.
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 24, 2024 10:14 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 9 years ago
4,087 Posts
|
Apr 25, 2024 05:14 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 5 years ago
1,305 Posts
|
I don’t think that is the problem. My original motor shows about the same amount of exposed shaft. Your arm is straight with the base part. It should be angled down a bit, with the spring pressing it against the glass. Many of the new crossbar links have ends slightly too long and square, which bind and won’t allow the arm to pull down to the glass. Remove the link and check the arm movement, as well as the arm spring pressure. The arm with no blade uninstalled should have quite a bend in it at the hinge passively resting. Your later TD style arm appears to have been repaired, with a rusty nut rather than a rivet. George
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 25, 2024 10:01 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 9 years ago
4,087 Posts
|
Apr 25, 2024 12:36 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 2 years ago
739 Posts
|
Bruce: You also have the wrong wiper arms for a early TD. You should have these:
https://mossmotors.com/160-690-wiper-arm-left-nut-on-front
After you get the arms the test will be that the left and right arms should be the same distance from the frame. So check the distance at the idler and make the motor one the same distance from the frame.
Chris
https://www.mg-cars.org.uk/mgtd/
https://www.mg-cars.org.uk/mgtf/
https://mossmotors.com/160-690-wiper-arm-left-nut-on-front
After you get the arms the test will be that the left and right arms should be the same distance from the frame. So check the distance at the idler and make the motor one the same distance from the frame.
Chris
https://www.mg-cars.org.uk/mgtd/
https://www.mg-cars.org.uk/mgtf/
Apr 25, 2024 02:30 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 5 years ago
1,305 Posts
|
There may also be an issue that the hole for the cotter pin in the bar is too small. There needs to be a little play to allow the angle to change as the wiper sweeps. I have a NOS bar, if I have a chance will look at the ends and measure. George
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 26, 2024 01:53 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 9 years ago
4,087 Posts
|
That is what my left arm looks like. So both should have the nut on the outside?
Ok. I found the right arm with the nut on the outside. I will get that ordered right away.
Another difference between early and later TD's. Looks like this change came well into production.
Thanks Chris. Education went up another knotch.
Bruce E. Cunha
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-04-26 01:58 AM by Bruce Cunha.
Ok. I found the right arm with the nut on the outside. I will get that ordered right away.
Another difference between early and later TD's. Looks like this change came well into production.
Thanks Chris. Education went up another knotch.
Bruce E. Cunha
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-04-26 01:58 AM by Bruce Cunha.
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 26, 2024 02:03 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 9 years ago
4,087 Posts
|
George that also could be. This is an aftermarket replacement.
My original bar had the cotter pin holes in the wrong side. Instead of the bend for folding the windshield going towards the windshield, it pointed up (or down).
I have no clue of the story on that. I got it that way back in 1972.
Bruce E. Cunha
My original bar had the cotter pin holes in the wrong side. Instead of the bend for folding the windshield going towards the windshield, it pointed up (or down).
I have no clue of the story on that. I got it that way back in 1972.
Bruce E. Cunha
Apr 26, 2024 04:41 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 5 years ago
1,305 Posts
|
LewPalmer
Lew Palmer
|
Apr 26, 2024 08:54 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 8 years ago
483 Posts
|
Apr 26, 2024 09:20 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 5 years ago
1,305 Posts
|
LewPalmer
Lew Palmer
|
Apr 26, 2024 01:21 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 8 years ago
483 Posts
|
George, I don't have my parts lists in front of me, but the pre-war cars certainly used the forward nut arm. I'm no longer a T-type font of knowledge, so I will bow to your knowledge. However, the both the Moss and Abingdon Spares catalog and others show the front facing nut as appropriate for late TDs and TFs, while the early TDs and TC used the front facing nut. Moss claims the changeover was at TD22316. It depends on the year of the car which dictates which arm is appropriate.
So I got some of it wrong. I had better stick to my Triple-M MGs and building and selling LEDs for British cars.
Cheers,
Lew
So I got some of it wrong. I had better stick to my Triple-M MGs and building and selling LEDs for British cars.
Cheers,
Lew
|
Topic Creator (OP)
Apr 26, 2024 06:55 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 9 years ago
4,087 Posts
|
Moss says the front nut arm goes to 22316. The back nut for TD after this and the TF.
I note that Brown and Gammons also lists an early and late TD number for the blades.
NTG says the front nut is for the TA through TC and YT. They list the back nut arm for the TD.
My parts manual from 1958 shows this (see picture). So that seems to go along with what Moss has.
Bruce E. Cunha
I note that Brown and Gammons also lists an early and late TD number for the blades.
NTG says the front nut is for the TA through TC and YT. They list the back nut arm for the TD.
My parts manual from 1958 shows this (see picture). So that seems to go along with what Moss has.
Bruce E. Cunha
Apr 30, 2024 07:50 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 5 years ago
1,305 Posts
|
Photos of original Lucas wiper bar. Note how oval the holes are. They are also very close to the end of and edge of the bar. Note rounded cross section. My 10 year old replacement bar is totally square. I suspect the repro bar's contour, likely round holes, and not being so close to the end cause the binding/lifting of the arm off of the glass. George
Attachments:
chrismgtd thanked GB3 for this post
Forums
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or contact the webmaster