MGB & GT Forum
A rather nice, rather fast LE50 GT for sale.
Posted by MGTONYGB
Topic Creator (OP)
Jun 22, 2017 02:37 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 15 years ago
1,049 Posts
|
Jun 22, 2017 03:08 PM
Joined 8 years ago
766 Posts
|
Nice! My GT has a long way to go before getting close to that.
Mgb1967.com A restoration & historical journal and FUN car related stuff
Lotus-Heritage.com All things Lotus
My MGB GT has been in the family for 53 years. Restoration almost finished! The Lotus? Mid life crises I should have bought when I was 25.
Mgb1967.com A restoration & historical journal and FUN car related stuff
Lotus-Heritage.com All things Lotus
My MGB GT has been in the family for 53 years. Restoration almost finished! The Lotus? Mid life crises I should have bought when I was 25.
Jun 22, 2017 03:11 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 13 years ago
15,856 Posts
|
SOunds sus. 484 bhp from a 1.8 litre motor?
The Frontline LE 50s used a 2 litre motor, from memory.
Herb
Questions about prostate cancer? Click here to join the discussion
The Frontline LE 50s used a 2 litre motor, from memory.
Herb
Questions about prostate cancer? Click here to join the discussion
Bankerdanny
Daniel Palmer
|
Jun 22, 2017 03:45 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 12 years ago
2,111 Posts
|
That horsepower figure is bull****. The formula is HP=(T x N)/5252 where T=peak torque and N=RPM's at peak torque
So if HP=424 and torque = 245, then solving for N= peak torque RPM of 9,089RPM
On a supercharged racing engine like this peak torque is maybe achieved at 4-5k, which keeping reported max torque, would yield HP in the range of 187-233. Pushing peak torque to 6,000 would get you 280.
At any rate 424hp is HIGHLY unlikely.
Oh, and a sub 3 sec 0-60 on tires that skinny is equally unlikely.
Endeavor to Persevere
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that you never know if they're true" - Abraham Lincoln
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-06-22 03:46 PM by Bankerdanny.
So if HP=424 and torque = 245, then solving for N= peak torque RPM of 9,089RPM
On a supercharged racing engine like this peak torque is maybe achieved at 4-5k, which keeping reported max torque, would yield HP in the range of 187-233. Pushing peak torque to 6,000 would get you 280.
At any rate 424hp is HIGHLY unlikely.
Oh, and a sub 3 sec 0-60 on tires that skinny is equally unlikely.
Endeavor to Persevere
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that you never know if they're true" - Abraham Lincoln
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-06-22 03:46 PM by Bankerdanny.
|
Jun 22, 2017 04:12 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 19 years ago
15,076 Posts
|
Jun 22, 2017 04:41 PM
Joined 9 years ago
1,442 Posts
|
Jun 22, 2017 04:48 PM
Joined 9 years ago
1,442 Posts
|
In reply to # 3537961 by Bankerdanny
That horsepower figure is bull****. The formula is HP=(T x N)/5252 where T=peak torque and N=RPM's at peak torque
So if HP=424 and torque = 245, then solving for N= peak torque RPM of 9,089RPM
On a supercharged racing engine like this peak torque is maybe achieved at 4-5k, which keeping reported max torque, would yield HP in the range of 187-233. Pushing peak torque to 6,000 would get you 280.
At any rate 424hp is HIGHLY unlikely.
Oh, and a sub 3 sec 0-60 on tires that skinny is equally unlikely.
So if HP=424 and torque = 245, then solving for N= peak torque RPM of 9,089RPM
On a supercharged racing engine like this peak torque is maybe achieved at 4-5k, which keeping reported max torque, would yield HP in the range of 187-233. Pushing peak torque to 6,000 would get you 280.
At any rate 424hp is HIGHLY unlikely.
Oh, and a sub 3 sec 0-60 on tires that skinny is equally unlikely.
Reading the ad the engine is a K series not a B series. The K is 16 valve dohc and as a standard they Rev to over 7000rpm. Not sure about the 400+ Bhp but the engine has potential.
stuntflyr
Chris McMillin
|
Jun 22, 2017 04:50 PM
Joined 12 years ago
3,160 Posts
|
Bankerdanny
Daniel Palmer
|
Jun 22, 2017 05:18 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 12 years ago
2,111 Posts
|
In reply to # 3538003 by Chalky
Reading the ad the engine is a K series not a B series. The K is 16 valve dohc and as a standard they Rev to over 7000rpm. Not sure about the 400+ Bhp but the engine has potential.
In reply to # 3537961 by Bankerdanny
That horsepower figure is bull****. The formula is HP=(T x N)/5252 where T=peak torque and N=RPM's at peak torque
So if HP=424 and torque = 245, then solving for N= peak torque RPM of 9,089RPM
On a supercharged racing engine like this peak torque is maybe achieved at 4-5k, which keeping reported max torque, would yield HP in the range of 187-233. Pushing peak torque to 6,000 would get you 280.
At any rate 424hp is HIGHLY unlikely.
Oh, and a sub 3 sec 0-60 on tires that skinny is equally unlikely.
So if HP=424 and torque = 245, then solving for N= peak torque RPM of 9,089RPM
On a supercharged racing engine like this peak torque is maybe achieved at 4-5k, which keeping reported max torque, would yield HP in the range of 187-233. Pushing peak torque to 6,000 would get you 280.
At any rate 424hp is HIGHLY unlikely.
Oh, and a sub 3 sec 0-60 on tires that skinny is equally unlikely.
Reading the ad the engine is a K series not a B series. The K is 16 valve dohc and as a standard they Rev to over 7000rpm. Not sure about the 400+ Bhp but the engine has potential.
Yes, I saw the pictures and it is obviously a modern engine and so a 7,000-7,500 RPM redline wouldn't surprise me. But again to get to the stated power requires a 9k RPM torque peak, which would be a-typical for a supercharged engine.
Endeavor to Persevere
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that you never know if they're true" - Abraham Lincoln
ohlord
Rob C
A tiny Island off the coast of Washington State, N.W., USA
Sign in to contact
1957 Land Rover Series I "EYEYIYI"
1957 Land Rover Series I "OVRLND" 1971 MG MGB 1971 MG MGB "Bedouin 2" & more |
Jun 22, 2017 05:53 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 12 years ago
28,878 Posts
|
440rwhp over 500 engine out of a stock bottomend 2.0L turbo engine at 6500 rpm is easily achievable
His claim of 170mph with the right gearing is pure b.s. the Mg's Cd wont allow that speed even pushing over 400hp
Sub 3 0-60 yeah sure
LNDRVR4X4.COM
Home of Project "INCARN8'
1957 Series 1 Land Rover electric VEHICLE CONVERSION
FIXITUPCHAP.COM
FIXITUPCHAP INCORPORATED
RD3 Radar/ Electronic Warfare Technician
VIETNAM 1969-1972
His claim of 170mph with the right gearing is pure b.s. the Mg's Cd wont allow that speed even pushing over 400hp
Sub 3 0-60 yeah sure
LNDRVR4X4.COM
Home of Project "INCARN8'
1957 Series 1 Land Rover electric VEHICLE CONVERSION
FIXITUPCHAP.COM
FIXITUPCHAP INCORPORATED
RD3 Radar/ Electronic Warfare Technician
VIETNAM 1969-1972
|
Jun 22, 2017 09:53 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 19 years ago
15,076 Posts
|
True but there's not much left of the original 1968 car other than the shell and VIN. I suppose the original VIN could easily have had 5 owners.
"Speed costs........how fast you want to spend?"
In reply to # 3538001 by Chalky
But not for a 1968 car.
In reply to # 3537984 by Simon Austin
Car has had 5 previous owners. Seems a lot for a young car...
But not for a 1968 car.
"Speed costs........how fast you want to spend?"
Bankerdanny
Daniel Palmer
|
Jun 22, 2017 10:20 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 12 years ago
2,111 Posts
|
ohlord
Rob C
A tiny Island off the coast of Washington State, N.W., USA
Sign in to contact
1957 Land Rover Series I "EYEYIYI"
1957 Land Rover Series I "OVRLND" 1971 MG MGB 1971 MG MGB "Bedouin 2" & more |
Jun 22, 2017 10:41 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 12 years ago
28,878 Posts
|
K TYPE rotrex supercharged 260hp
Tuned and boosted with proper engine management the 1.8L has shown over 400HP
Supercharged
LNDRVR4X4.COM
Home of Project "INCARN8'
1957 Series 1 Land Rover electric VEHICLE CONVERSION
FIXITUPCHAP.COM
FIXITUPCHAP INCORPORATED
RD3 Radar/ Electronic Warfare Technician
VIETNAM 1969-1972
Tuned and boosted with proper engine management the 1.8L has shown over 400HP
Supercharged
LNDRVR4X4.COM
Home of Project "INCARN8'
1957 Series 1 Land Rover electric VEHICLE CONVERSION
FIXITUPCHAP.COM
FIXITUPCHAP INCORPORATED
RD3 Radar/ Electronic Warfare Technician
VIETNAM 1969-1972
Bankerdanny
Daniel Palmer
|
Jun 23, 2017 10:44 AM
Top Contributor
Joined 12 years ago
2,111 Posts
|
I don't doubt that the engine can be made to produce that level of power, but it would require very high boost or stratospheric RPM's. Given the low torque number compared to HP, this engine seems to have gone the latter route, but a torque peak that high in the RPM range is not typical for boosted engines.
Endeavor to Persevere
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that you never know if they're true" - Abraham Lincoln
Endeavor to Persevere
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that you never know if they're true" - Abraham Lincoln
Jun 23, 2017 05:27 PM
Top Contributor
Joined 10 years ago
2,560 Posts
|
Forums
Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Read the Forum Help (FAQ) or contact the webmaster