MG-2013 is only 55 days away! · Corvallis, OR · July 17–21, 2013 · Visit MG-2013.com or the MG-2013 Forum for more info

MG Engine Swaps Forum

Welcome! Sign In Register
Please Sign In or Register to Search

4.1 V6 Buick or 4.3 V6 Chevy, which would you choose?

Posted by TeamEvil 
/ /
Gone, /, Kiribati   kir
Hey,

Just a quick question. I have a 4.1 Buick V6 all set to go, a Buddy would like to have it and will trade me a 4.3 Chevy V6 for it. The engines are similar in that they both have Edelbrock intakes and carbs, smallish cams, new timing gears and chains, head work, headers, and mechanical/vac advance HEI distributors. Both all set to go, no computers or messing around.

Either engine will go up against an overdrive automatic transmission (growing knee problems prevent a T-5) and ought to be a reasonably easy fit. I like the Chevy for it's small block heritage, like the Buick for its 215/300 heritage, and understand both engines and their mechanicals pretty well.

The engine will be fitted to an MGA.

Given the similarities between the two, if you had a choice, which would you chose. I'm wondering and need to decide soon, but really can't . . .

Thanks !

TC

. You can hide this ad & support this site by upgrading to a Gold Membership ~ click here for more info.
Jim Nichols
Sequim,WA, USA   usa
Coin flip?
BritishV8 Avatar
Curtis Jacobson
Longmont CO, USA   usa
Buick put the distributor at the correct end. It weighs a bit less too, doesn't it?

. You can hide this ad & support this site by upgrading to a Gold Membership ~ click here for more info.
Hank R
Denver, CO, USA   usa
Measure the width. I beleive the Buick is a little narrower.
rollininmymg Avatar
Eric Delgado
Del City,Ok, USA   usa
1975 MG MGB
I have a 4.3 chevy a throttle body in mine and I love it.

. You can hide this ad & support this site by upgrading to a Gold Membership ~ click here for more info.
Duncan Avatar
Duncan Cowen
Vancouver, Canada   can
Hard to beat the fact that the 4.3 is everywhere... but a 4.1 with a 200-4R sounds like a good thing if it's even a wee bit smaller.
Dwight Avatar
Dwight McCullough
Ham Lake Minnesota, USA   usa
3.4 ltr Camaro engine, waaaaaaaay better............

/ /
Gone, /, Kiribati   kir
Yup ! ! That's why I'm asking for a little shove in either direction.

The engines are just TOO similar, but I KNOW that one would probably sit better than the other, you know?

I guess that, unless I hear something to completely tip the scales, I'll go for the Chevy; looks like a lot of the MGB folks have opted for that engine and seem to love it. Not nearly as many have chosen the Buick. PLUS my Buddy really does want it for his "80-something" Buick.

Is there anything to be cautious or concerned about with the Chevy? I've dealt with the oiling problems with the Buick, any similar quirks particular to the 4.3 Chevy?

Do they make power like the Buick? Similar bottom end grunt? Especially interested in the max over-all RPM? The Buick seemed spent before 5,000 RPM, how is the little Chevy? My old 350/Turbo 350 set-up in the Beetle was also spent by 5,000 RPM and the 4.3 looks to be based on the old small block Chevy.

Wondering . . .

Thank you !

TC



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/21/2012 01:17PM by TeamEvil.
bills Avatar
Bill Spohn
W. Vancouver, BC, Canada   can
Getting one of those into an MGA poses some challenges in terms of width. I agree with Dwight that the narrow V6 would be engine of first choice.



Bill Spohn www.rhodo.citymax.com/carstuff.html
1958 MGA Twincam (race car), 1962 MGA Deluxe Coupe
1969 MGC roadster, 1957 Jamaican MGA
1965 Jensen CV8, 1971 Jensen Interceptor
1969 Lamborghini Islero S, 1988 Fiero GT turbo
2009 Pontiac Solstice GXP Coupe
West Vancouver BC


/ /
Gone, /, Kiribati   kir
I don't have that option, really, just the two engines to choose from.

If it comes to a 60 degree engine, I'll run with a small block Ford. I had a 2.8 in my old MGB and never liked it. Too fussy, to small, no top end. It's either a bigger V6 or a SBF I figure.

TC
BritishV8 Avatar
Curtis Jacobson
Longmont CO, USA   usa
In reply to # 2018208 by TeamEvil I guess that, unless I hear something to completely tip the scales, I'll go for the Chevy; looks like a lot of the MGB folks have opted for that engine and seem to love it. Not nearly as many have chosen the Buick.

There's a case to be made for either option. However if popularity is what you're going to base your decision on, I suspect more people have installed the 3.8 version of the Buick V6 in MGBs than the 4.3 Chevy. In MGAs, I have the score at one to one. In any case, your sample size is tiny. The only 4.3L conversions I've seen in person belonged to Mike Maloney (in an MGB) and Jeb Blanchard (in an MGA). Mike subsequently took the V6 out of his '74 GT and replaced it with a Rover V8! (Perhaps that should tell you something.)

What are you thinking of doing for exhaust? That's one of the hardest aspects of most conversions. For either of these engines, you're likely to have to make your own headers. I've seen some fairly unorthodox solutions...





/ /
Gone, /, Kiribati   kir
I DO have several Rover engines to chose from, 3.5, 3.9, and a recent 4.6 but the better/later engines require all of the early engine's ancillaries. That would mean stripping the 3.5 down for the timing cover, pulleys, oil pan, distributor, oil pump, etc. then picking up a less-than-perfect Edelbrock manifold and Holley carb. I have some Rover MGB V8 block-hugger headers that may work, but I was just thinking of running some old Rover sedan exhaust manifolds backwards/flipped and fitting a TVR-style exhaust out the front, down, and back again to the rear.

Maybe . . . but probably not.

I've decided to go with the Chevy. Not exactly sure why, but I think that it'll return more horsepower than the Buick after all of the modifications are completed.

Thanks for the help/comments !

TC
Hank R
Denver, CO, USA   usa
FWIW I have a 4000 lb 4x4 extended cab S-10 with the 4.3 and auto. It runs strong, much stronger than a lighter S-15 Jimmy that I had with a TB 2.8 and then upgraded to a TB 3.4. The 3.4 was stronger than the 2.8, but not near as strong as the 4.3. If you have the ambition and skill to do the extra work to fit the 4.3, then my hat is off to you and good luck.

Jim Blackwood Avatar
* BlownMGB-V8
Gunpowder Rd., USA   usa
I wish you luck with the Chevy, but I'll confess to not being a big fan. I'm more of a Buick enthusiast simply because those engines work well. However, if you're going with an automatic the same 2004r will work with either one (dual pattern) and has much better gears so that part is good either way.

As far as power potential, have you ever heard of Grand National? These engines have been proven to 1000+ horsepower. Admittedly N/A you won't be there but the heads, intakes, and internals are all available. I do not think the Chevy will do any better. Headers are a wash, then we're down to motor mounts and incidentals, where the expenses start to add up.

Check the weights, I think the Chevy is at least 50 lbs heavier. In fact it is heavier than the '64 Buick 300.

Which brings up one thing I would consider a HUGE consideration. IF you build the car with the 4.1 and decide later that you really would rather have a V8, it is a pretty simple matter to fit a 300 in it's place, as about the only thing you will need to change are the headers which are readily available. And the finished weight will be about 50lbs heavier than stock.

If you build the 4.3 the car will be close to 100lbs heavier than stock and if you go V8 the logical choice would seem to be SBC, meaning custom headers and add yet another 50lbs or more.

Worth thinking about.

Jim
Dwight Avatar
Dwight McCullough
Ham Lake Minnesota, USA   usa
The 3.4 ltr. 60 degree V-6 with a T5 trans, weighs almost the same as the original engine/trans. Handling is identical to stock. My son's puts out 140 HP at the wheels and all it has is a better intake and headers.
That is almost triple of the OE engine.
Yes, my '77 'B' still has the 1.8 engine, but 'tuned a bit to stay in a autox class......
If you use the all aluminum 3.5 engine, that has 215 HP stock. Versus 160 for the 3.4............
If you were to use some boost?

Here's Brian's website.

http://bmcautos.com/



In reply to # 2018209 by bills Getting one of those into an MGA poses some challenges in terms of width. I agree with Dwight that the narrow V6 would be engine of first choice.


/ /
Gone, /, Kiribati   kir
Again, thanks. For the help, and for confusing me even more.

I'm going to try the Chevy for now. Something different for me, never been much of a "Chevy Guy" in a long time, own a nearly new Mustang and always loved Buick engines. Even had one in back of my Karmann Ghia.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v136/TeamEvil/File0002.jpg

If it happens, I'll certainly post pics of whatever engine gets installed.

I appreciate the help and comments for sure,

TC
danmas Avatar
Dan Masters
Alcoa, Tennessee, USA   usa
1974 MG MGB GT "Powered By Ford"
In reply to # 2018888 by Dwight The 3.4 ltr. 60 degree V-6 with a T5 trans, weighs almost the same as the original engine/trans. Handling is identical to stock. My son's puts out 140 HP at the wheels and all it has is a better intake and headers.
That is almost triple of the OE engine.

The 302 Ford V-8 with a T5 trans, weighs almost the same as the original engine/trans/OD. Handling is identical to stock. Steve Carrick's puts out 275 plus HP at the wheels and all it has is a better intake and headers.
That is almost double of the 3.4 engine.

None of which is relevent to this thread, but interesting anyway.

Just to keep this post on-topic, I think the Buick V6 would the better choice of the two that were the options in the OP.

PS: I'm laid up in bed for few days with back problems and nothing to do but play with my Ipad. Can you say bored?

1744 Avatar
Bill Guzman
California, USA   usa
1973 MG MGB GT "Green GT"
1974 MG MGB "Punking"
There is some argument about the Ford V8 handling the same??? MMMMM 40 Lb extra at the front. Regardless if it is behind the axle, 40 lb is 40 lb at front. But is not a bad swap, in fact is a nice swap.

Back on the main topic. The Buick is a great engine and can make lots of power, I mean 500 an up without a turbo.
The power of the Buick is dependent on how big of a budget you have. Either 3.8 or 4.1.

Chevrolet 4.3 can also make lots of power and less expensive to make hp. Many parts from the SBC will fit the V6.
There are two choices of 4.3 V6 even fire and uneven fire.
Valves, springs, rockers, rods, flywheel, bell housing etc etc can be transfer from the V8 to the V6. Lots of part out there for them. Also aluminum heads and block, be ready to pay lots $$$ for the block. All of the performance parts can be bought at your local Chev. Dealer.

Manual trans is a bit more $$$$ on the Buick due to bell housing.
Which one will fit better??? Both will fit and same amount of work.

I have a Buick V6 and had a 4.3 V6 that made 250 hp to rear wheels on a small budget. There are some good articles on Hot Rod magazines.

Buick, you can purchase a aluminum block heads etc etc and make an easy street 500 hp engine.



It is our attitude that will determine the outcome
Classic Conversions Engineering MG Classic Conversions V6. Wilwood brake dealer.
/ /
Gone, /, Kiribati   kir
Again, thank you for the advice, but for me, this time it's gonna be the Chevy. I'm not entirely sure of the mods done to it, but even using a stock baseline, the Buick is around 115 horsepower, the Chevy closer to 180/200 depending.

I've kinda spent all of my engine budget on a really built up aluminum head, high compression, four barrel Buick 300 destined for the '27 Chopped coupe, total nostalgia ride.

I've decided completely against anything Rover because of the cost of conversion ancillaries. My only options for this car are the two V6 engines. Seems that getting additional power from the Buick is simple too expensive right now. Kenne Bell stuff costs coin, factory hi-po parts are highly praised and even MOE expensive. The little Chevy can be built up using auto jumble finds, and (as I found) already starts with more horsepower than the Buick could make with over a grands worth of work pit into it.

So . . . gotta go Chevy this time around. Buick 300 for the hot rod. Buick V6 off to my Buddy with the Regal.

As always, I totally appreciate the comments and information,

TC
Jim Blackwood Avatar
* BlownMGB-V8
Gunpowder Rd., USA   usa
Hope the end result makes you happy. :-)

Bill, I think the bellhousing costs would be the same, since the V6 uses the same bell as the 350 Buick... and the big block... and Olds... and Pontiac... and... Cadillac? Anyway about as common as dirt.

Jim

Add your reply here, or post your own questions!

Members Sign In if you've already registered, or
Register a New Account
Registration is free and takes less than a minute

Having trouble posting or changing forum settings?
Check the Forum Help File (FAQ) or contact the webmaster.
View the archived version of this thread.
Built using Phorum Open Source Software


Join Our Club

Sign In to post questions or share your photos!

MGExp Menu

Welcome

Forums ->

MGB & GT

MG Midget

Buy, Sell & Trade

Vendor & Group Buy

MG Engine Swaps

Original MG

MGA

MGC

MG Magnette

1100 & 1300

T-Series & Prewar

Modern MGs

MG Motorsports

MG-2013 Event

Member Meetup

Other Vehicles

Off Topic

Clubs

Forum Search

Latest Posts

Journals

Calendar

Membership

Tech Library

Car Registry

Cars For Sale

Model Info

Motorsport

Directory

Member Map

MGExp Store

Search

Advertising Info

Smartphone quick link
mgexp.mobi

Adjust Text Size

Larger Smaller
Reset Save